<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enterprise Strategy Group &#187; Jennifer Gahm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/category/our-team/analysts/jennifer-gahm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Virtual Tape Library Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/the-state-of-virtual-tape-library-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/the-state-of-virtual-tape-library-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection Software & Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information and Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauren Whitehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tape and Optical Storage Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VTL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=17447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess the current state of the data protection market, ESG recently surveyed 510 North America-based senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for evaluating, purchasing, or managing data protection technologies—such as backup and recovery software, data replication software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess the current state of the data protection market, ESG recently surveyed 510 North America-based senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for evaluating, purchasing, or managing data protection technologies—such as backup and recovery software, data replication software, and disk or tape storage systems used for secondary data storage—for their organization.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>How pervasive is the usage of VTL technology in backup environments? Does this vary based on the size of respondent organizations?</li>
<li>Is VTL typically used more by organizations with an existing tape infrastructure as a bridge to a predominantly disk-based backup environment?</li>
<li>Among organizations currently using VTL, what are their future plans regarding their VTL infrastructure?</li>
<li>Why won’t current VTL users continue to invest in the technology?</li>
<li>What—if any—plans do organizations using other types of disk-based backup solutions have to leverage VTL technology? What are the profiles of these potential adopters?</li>
<li>Why won’t current disk-based backup users adopt VTL technology?</li>
<li>Among organizations currently using tape as their backup media but planning to transition to disk-based backup solutions, what is the likelihood of using VTL?</li>
</ul>
<p>Survey participants represent a wide range of industries including manufacturing, financial services, communications and media, health care, retail, government, and business services.</p>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please   download the executive summary below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/07/ESG-Research-Report-VTL-Trends-Abstract-Jun-10.pdf" target="_blank">ESG Research Report The State of Virtual Tape Library Technology Executive Summary</a></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/the-state-of-virtual-tape-library-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Center Consolidation and Construction Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/data-center-consolidation-and-construction-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/data-center-consolidation-and-construction-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Laliberte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Facilities Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Strategy and Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IaaS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midmarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=17380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess data center facility consolidation and construction priorities over the next 12-18 months, ESG recently surveyed 515 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for or familiar with their organization’s data center strategies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess data center facility consolidation and construction priorities over the next 12-18 months, ESG recently surveyed 515 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for or familiar with their organization’s data center strategies at either an entire organization level or at a business unit/division/branch level.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>How many data centers do organizations operate today? How do these numbers vary by company size and industry?</li>
<li>To what extent are organizations planning to reduce/consolidate their overall number of data centers?</li>
<li>How many organizations currently have new data center construction projects underway?</li>
<li>Where do data center consolidation and new data center construction initiatives rank on organizations’ current list of IT priorities?</li>
<li>How do data center consolidation and construction plans vary by company size class and industry?</li>
<li>How do the number of existing data centers and spending mode impact data center consolidation?</li>
<li>What role will outsourcing and software-as-a-service (SaaS) models play in data center consolidation plans?</li>
<li>What is the impact of consolidation efforts and corporate risk tolerance on new data center construction?</li>
<li>What are the greatest factors influencing new data center construction?</li>
</ul>
<p>Survey participants represented a wide range of industries including manufacturing, financial services, communications and media, health care, retail, government, and business services.</p>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this 24-page report, please download the executive summary below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/06/ESG-Research-Report-2010-Data-Center-Trends-Abstract.pdf" target="_blank">ESG Research Report Data Center Consolidation and Construction Trends Executive Summary</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/06/data-center-consolidation-and-construction-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Data Protection Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/04/2010-data-protection-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/04/2010-data-protection-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backup As A Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup and Recovery Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Migration Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection Software & Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Reduction Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Replication Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information and Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauren Whitehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deduplication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=16038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess the current state of the data protection market, ESG recently surveyed 510 North America-based senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for evaluating, purchasing, or managing data protection technologies—such as backup and recovery software, data replication software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess the current state of the data protection market, ESG recently surveyed 510 North America-based senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.  All respondents were personally responsible for evaluating, purchasing, or managing data protection technologies—such as backup and recovery software, data replication software, and disk or tape storage systems used for secondary data storage—for their organization.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What are the primary data protection challenges that organizations are currently facing?</li>
<li>Which areas of data protection will merit the greatest level of investment in 2010?</li>
<li>How confident are organizations that their data protection applications and processes are adequately protecting their data?</li>
<li>Which types of data protection technologies and processes are currently in use? How will this change going forward?</li>
<li>What impact does the business value of data have on data protection applications and processes?</li>
<li>How satisfied are organizations with their current data protection technologies and strategies?</li>
<li>What types of storage solutions are currently used to support data protection requirements and how will this change over time?</li>
<li>How pervasive has data deduplication usage become over the last several years?</li>
</ul>
<p>Survey participants represent a wide range of industries including manufacturing, financial services, communications and media, health care, retail, government, and business services.</p>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please  download the executive summary below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/05/ESG-Research-Report-2010-Data-Protection-Trends-Abstract-Apr-10.pdf" target="_blank">ESG Research Report 2010 Data Protection Trends Executive Summary</a></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/04/2010-data-protection-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESG Research Brief: 2010 Storage Spending Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/2010-storage-spending-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/2010-storage-spending-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Peters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terri McClure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=13685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than one-half (54%) of midmarket and enterprise organizations surveyed will increase their spending on storage hardware in 2010. Spending will vary by company size, vertical industry, and organizational behavior. Using data from ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intention Survey, this brief analyzes storage spending at both a general and solution/product level and includes recommendations as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="abstract">More than one-half (54%) of midmarket and enterprise organizations surveyed will increase their spending on storage hardware in 2010. Spending will vary by company size, vertical industry, and organizational behavior.  Using data from ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intention Survey, this brief analyzes storage spending at both a general and solution/product level and includes recommendations as to how storage vendors should segment customers and resource their marketing programs for 2010.</div>
<private_premium>
<h1>Storage Spending to Increase in 2010</h1>
<p>ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey reveals good news for the storage industry in 2010.  First, 52% of midmarket (i.e., 100 to 999 employees) and enterprise (i.e., 1,000 or more employees) organizations will increase general IT spending in 2010 as opposed to only 43% in 2009.<a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a> More importantly, specific spending on storage equipment also looks promising, as 54% of the organizations surveyed said they will increase their spending on storage hardware this year, up from just 38% in 2009 (see Figure 1).  Conversely—and just as significant to storage vendors—only 15% of organizations will decrease spending on storage hardware in 2010, compared to 25% of respondents in 2009.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 1. Storage Hardware Spending in 2010, Compared to 2009</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13690" title="StorageSpendingF1" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF1.png" alt="" width="624" height="355" /></a></p>
<h1>IT Initiatives Driving 2010 Storage Spending</h1>
<p>What specific IT initiatives are driving this planned increase in storage hardware spending?  For one, organizations with major 2010 initiatives involving new data center construction appear set to take that opportunity to refresh their storage infrastructure: 66% of these organizations will increase storage hardware spending in 2010 compared to 54% of ESG’s total respondent base (see Figure 2).  Other IT priorities driving above-average new storage hardware spending  in 2010 include desktop virtualization (66%), new business intelligence initiatives (65%), business continuity/disaster recovery programs (63%) and enterprise content management (ECM) projects (62%), to name but a few.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 2. 2010 IT Initiatives Most Likely to Drive   Increased Storage Hardware Spending</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13691" title="StorageSpendingF2" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF2.png" alt="" width="618" height="420" /></a></p>
<h1>Storage Spending Outlook by Industry and Organizational Behavior</h1>
<p>For storage vendors, solutions and marketing messages tied to the IT priorities above should find a receptive audience among 2010 IT buyers.  Storage vendors will also want to know more specifically where they should best focus their efforts and resources in 2010 from a vertical industry perspective.  As shown in Figure 3, health care, business services, financial services, and communications and media organizations are the most likely to have plans to increase storage hardware spending in 2010.  On the other hand, fewer than 50% of the organizations surveyed in other industries— which includes both federal and state/local government, education, and transportation and logistics—expect to see budget increases for storage hardware this year.  It is worth noting, however, that organizations in the federal government and transportation and logistics industries are very much <em>maintaining</em> storage spending and were least likely to actually foresee spending cuts in 2010.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 3. 2010 Storage Hardware Spending, by Industry</div>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-15475" title="StorageSpendingF3" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF31.png" alt="" width="632" height="364" /><br />
Changes in an organization’s overall 2010 IT spending profile compared to 2009 can also serve as a key indicator of  storage hardware purchasing plans. As shown in Table 1, those organizations that are still focused primarily on cutting IT costs are unlikely to increase storage hardware spending while those in “growth mode” will be far more active buyers.<em> </em></p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 1. 2010 Storage Hardware Spending Increase,   by Current IT Spending Mode</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13695" title="StorageSpendingT1" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT1.png" alt="" width="635" height="142" /></a>ESG also analyzed storage hardware purchasing plans by company psychographic profiles and found a number of interesting trends.  Most significantly, the manner in which an organization typically purchases IT products and services is a strong predictor of increased storage hardware spending.  Respondents that classify their organizations as “leading-edge” consumers of IT products and services are far more likely to have plans for increased storage hardware spending in 2010 than are those with more conservative IT purchasing habits (see Table 2).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 2. 2010 Storage Hardware Spending Increase, by IT Purchasing Pattern</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13696" title="StorageSpendingT2" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT2.png" alt="" width="638" height="243" /></a></p>
<h1>Which Storage Products Will Sell in 2010?</h1>
<p>2010 storage spending corresponds to organizations’ ongoing need to manage explosive data growth, which was identified by ESG’s survey respondents as a top-five IT priority over the next 12-18 months. Indications of new raw storage system purchases—whether SAN (31%) or NAS (22%)—might well indicate that equipment purchases postponed in 2009 return to the top of the priority list as solutions in organizations struggling with that data growth and its associated management challenges (see Figure 4).  Other top storage solutions for 2010 include data replication, storage virtualization, more power-efficient hardware, and data reduction technologies.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 4. Top Areas for Storage Investments in 2010</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13693" title="StorageSpendingF4" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF4.png" alt="" width="624" height="378" /></a><strong>2010 storage investments by company size: </strong>When analyzed by company size, ESG’s data reveals that enterprise organizations are more likely than their midmarket counterparts to have 2010 plans for initiatives such as tiered storage, new SAN system purchase, data replication, and storage encryption (see Figure 5).  For their part, midmarket organizations are slightly more likely than larger organizations to have plans for NAS-based systems, tape replacement, and storage management tools.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 5. Top Areas for Storage Investments in 2010, by Midmarket vs. Enterprise</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF5.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13694" title="StorageSpendingF5" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingF5.png" alt="" width="625" height="435" /></a><strong>2010 storage investments by industry: </strong>The top five specific storage-related 2010 priorities by industry are displayed in Table 3.  Among the key findings:</p>
<ul>
<li>Major verticals such as health care and federal government are in lockstep with respect to four out of five of their top storage priorities: data replication, new SAN purchases, new NAS purchases, and storage encryption.</li>
<li>Financial and business services both cite data reduction as their top storage solution priority for 2010.</li>
<li>Communications and media firms also look to data reduction—and new NAS systems—to help control and manage ever-increasing stores of file-based content.</li>
</ul>
<div class="graph_top">Table 3. Top 5 Areas for Storage Investments in 2010, by Industry</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13697" title="StorageSpendingT3" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT3.png" alt="" width="643" height="517" /></a><strong>2010 storage investments by top business initiatives: </strong>Shifting away from industry-specific storage trends, ESG has also examined planned 2010 storage investments as they pertain to respondents’ specific business initiatives.  The most noticeable ‘take-away’ from this analysis is that “green” has re-emerged as a key driver for storage spending; perhaps this is a response to a rebounding economy; potentially, it is also a renewed semantic acceptability for a term that has been subsumed during the downturn into the more ‘austerity-acceptable’ terminology of ‘efficiency.’ Whatever the motivation, the adoption of certain storage technologies—including SRM software, flash-based SSDs, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)—can be significantly identified as key areas of 2010 investment by organizations that cite “green initiatives” as having a significant impact on their IT spending decisions over the next 12-18 months (see Table 4).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 4. 2010 Storage Hardware Spending Increase, by Business Initiatives Influencing 2010 IT Spending</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13698" title="StorageSpendingT4" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT4.png" alt="" width="639" height="308" /></a></p>
<h1>The Bigger Truth</h1>
<p>The preceding data can help storage vendors by identifying high-probability target buyers—whether by company size, industry, IT priorities, and/or business initiatives that are underway.  The psychographic data presented can also be used to separate strong from weak prospects.  Smart companies will sort through their leads and use ESG’s data as the basis for a set of qualifying questions.  For example, telemarketing staff could call prospects and ask them:</p>
<ol>
<li>“Is your organization in IT cost containment or growth mode?”  Growth mode prospects should be highlighted as they are probably increasing their storage hardware spending.</li>
<li>“Would you consider your organization to be a ‘leading edge’ IT consumer?”  If yes, this prospect probably has significant storage purchasing plans for 2010.</li>
<li>“Does your organization have 2010 IT initiatives in the areas of virtualization (server and desktop), data center construction/consolidation, improved business intelligence, business continuity/disaster recovery, or enterprise content management?”  All prospects answering yes to any of these are likely to have significant storage hardware spending plans.</li>
<li>“Does your organization have significant green businesses initiatives underway?” Such organizations are more likely to be interested in power efficiency, better storage management, solid state and converged networking.</li>
</ol>
<p>Beyond such qualification exercises, ESG’s data can also underpin the blueprints for vendors’ vertical industry sales and marketing strategies; this is because the data not only indicates which industries are buying storage systems, software, and networking, but also the specific technologies that they plan to purchase. Table 5 takes the insights from ESG’s Spending Intentions research and provides a general, actionable guide—by industry—that can help storage providers fine tune the optimum application of their marketing budgets. It does this by providing guidance for marketing messages and plans in industry-appropriate directions, which can in turn help to steer accurately focused investments in marketing programs and sales tactics.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 5. Vertical Industry Sales and Marketing Blueprint for Storage Vendors</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT5.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13689" title="StorageSpendingT5" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/StorageSpendingT5.png" alt="" width="644" height="794" /></a></p>
<hr size="1" /><a name="_ftn1">[1]</a> Source: ESG Research Report, <em>2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey</em>, January 2010.
</private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/2010-storage-spending-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESG Research Brief: 2010 Security Spending Trends</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/esg-research-brief-2010-security-spending-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/esg-research-brief-2010-security-spending-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information and Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Oltsik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=13654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than one-half (55%) of midmarket and enterprise organizations surveyed will increase their spending on information security products and services in 2010. Spending will vary by company size, vertical industry, and organizational behavior. Using data from ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intention Survey, this brief analyzes security spending at both a general and solution/product level and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="abstract">More than one-half (55%) of midmarket and enterprise organizations surveyed will increase their spending on information security products and services in 2010. Spending will vary by company size, vertical industry, and organizational behavior.  Using data from ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intention Survey, this brief analyzes security spending at both a general and solution/product level and includes recommendations as to how information security vendors should segment customers and fund their marketing programs for 2010. </div>
<private_premium>
<h1>Security Spending Poised to Increase in 2010</h1>
<p>ESG’s 2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey finds two items of good news for the information security industry in 2010.  First, 52% of midmarket (i.e., 100 to 999 employees) and enterprise (i.e., 1,000 or more employees) organizations will increase overall IT spending in 2010 as opposed to only 43% of organizations in 2009.<a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a> Second, spending on information security products and services specifically looks even more promising, as 55% of organizations surveyed say they will increase their security spending in 2010, up from just 36% in 2009 (see Figure 1).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 1. Security Spending Change in 2010</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13658" title="2010SecuritySpendF1" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF1.png" alt="" width="603" height="331" /></a>When these aggregate numbers are broken down further, it becomes clear that enterprises will be more likely than their midmarket counterparts to increase information security spending in 2010. As shown in Figure 2, 61% of enterprises will increase security spending in 2010, compared to 48% of midmarket organizations.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 2. Security Spending Change in 2010, by   Midmarket vs. Enterprise</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13659" title="2010SecuritySpendF2" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF2.png" alt="" width="627" height="343" /></a></p>
<h1>Security Spending by Industry</h1>
<p>2010 spending on information security products and services looks promising overall, but ESG’s data indicates that vendors would be best served by focusing sales and marketing resources on the enterprise rather than on the midmarket segment.  ESG also found vast differences in security spending trends by industry.  As Table 1 indicates, financial services firms, health care organizations, and federal government agencies are most likely to bolster information security spending in 2010 while state &amp; local government, education, and manufacturing spending will be far less robust (see Table 1).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 1. 2010 Security Spending Change, by Industry</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT1a.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13670" title="2010SecuritySpendT1a" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT1a.png" alt="" width="643" height="227" /></a></p>
<h1>Security Spending by Organizational Behavior Considerations</h1>
<p>ESG introduced several questions about organizational behavior, attitudes, strategy, and management philosophy into its 2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey.  There are some clear and interesting relationships between this data and information security spending plans.  For example, ESG found that organizations that consider upper management as “risk takers” are more likely to increase information security spending than those whose management teams are more risk averse (see Figure 3).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 3. Security Spending Change in 2010, by Type of   Management Team</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13660" title="2010SecuritySpendF3" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF3.png" alt="" width="615" height="277" /></a>IT purchasing behavior is also a good predictor of information security spending plans.  Organizations that describe themselves as “leading edge” IT consumers are more likely to increase information security spending in 2010 than those classifying their organization as an “average” or “laggard” consumer of IT products and services (see Figure 4).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 4. Security Spending Change in 2010, by   Purchasing Patterns</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13661" title="2010SecuritySpendF4" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF4.png" alt="" width="624" height="294" /></a></p>
<h1>Top Areas for Security Spending in 2010</h1>
<p>ESG also asked respondents a more specific question regarding which areas of information security they planned to invest in this year.  The top three categories are network security (i.e., firewalls, IDS/IPS, VPN, etc.), desktop/endpoint security (i.e., antivirus, Internet security suites, full-disk encryption, etc.), and web/messaging security (i.e., URL filtering, virus scanning, web threat management, anti-SPAM, etc.) (see Figure 5).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 5. Top Areas of Information Security Spending in 2010</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF5.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13662" title="2010SecuritySpendF5" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF5.png" alt="" width="611" height="432" /></a>Some interesting distinctions on security spending surface when the data is analyzed by organization size (see Figure 6).  For example, smaller organizations are more likely to have plans for network security, desktop security, and web/messaging security initiatives than larger organizations.  On the other hand, enterprises are slightly more likely to have plans to spend on physical security, application/database security, and identity and access management than are smaller organizations; they are also much more apt to spend on information assurance and security management products and services than their smaller counterparts.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 6. Security-Specific Investments Over Next   12-18 Months, by Midmarket vs. Enterprise</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF6.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13663" title="2010SecuritySpendF6" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendF6.png" alt="" width="619" height="361" /></a>Finally, ESG analyzed the data on specific 2010 security investment areas by vertical industry and found a number of fascinating correlations.  For example, federal government, state &amp; local government ,and health care will be the biggest purchasers of network security equipment (i.e. firewalls, IDS/IPS, VPNs, etc.); education and state &amp; local government dominate desktop/endpoint security spending; and financial services and health care are the industries most likely to invest in identity and access management systems in 2010 (see Table 2).</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 2. Security-Specific Investments Over Next 12-18 Months, by Industry</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT2a.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13671" title="2010SecuritySpendT2a" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT2a.png" alt="" width="644" height="325" /></a></p>
<h1>Research Implications</h1>
<p>Security vendors are generally enthusiastic about their outlook for 2010, but ESG’s data indicates that sales prospects vary greatly by vertical industry, organizational behavior, and organizational size.  Because of this, it is imperative that vendors fine-tune sales and marketing strategies appropriately.</p>
<p>ESG believes that the first step in effective, targeted sales and marketing efforts is to look beyond security alone. Companies and industries looking to invest in IT to propel their businesses will likely take risks and purchase cutting-edge tools of many kinds.  These firms will also need to better manage any security issues associated with these business and technology initiatives and will thus increase investments in security technologies.  Industries likely to invest most in new IT-driven business processes include financial services, health care, and federal government agencies—the very industries with the highest percentage of organizations increasing security spending.</p>
<p>Ultimately, ESG’s data provides a blueprint for vertical industry sales and marketing strategies (see Table 3).  This should help vendors adjust budgets, prioritize programs, and create the right tools for direct and indirect sales efforts.</p>
<p>Information security vendors must also segment and adjust their midmarket and enterprise marketing strategies.  In general, enterprise marketing budgets should increase while midmarket budgets should remain flat or decrease slightly (depending, of course, on the target market for a given vendor, product, or service).  Furthermore, enterprise marketing dollars should be skewed toward identity and access management, information assurance, and security management and operations technologies and services.  Alternatively, midmarket efforts should concentrate on network security, desktop security, and web and messaging security.  Since midmarket companies are also most likely to purchase managed services, it may be worthwhile to double down on programs focused on SaaS (software-as-a-service) or cloud offerings in these areas.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 3. Vertical Industry Sales and Marketing Blueprint for Information Security Vendors</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13657" title="2010SecuritySpendT3" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/02/2010SecuritySpendT3.png" alt="" width="645" height="790" /></a></p>
<hr size="1" /><a name="_ftn1">[1]</a> Source: ESG Research Report, <em>2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey</em>, January 2010.
</private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/02/esg-research-brief-2010-security-spending-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/01/2010-it-spending-intentions-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/01/2010-it-spending-intentions-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Strategy and Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/?p=12469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess IT data center priorities over the next 12-18 months, ESG recently surveyed 515 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations. All respondents were personally responsible for or familiar with their organization’s 2009 IT spending as well as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess IT data center priorities over the next 12-18 months, ESG recently surveyed 515 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations. All respondents were personally responsible for or familiar with their organization’s 2009 IT spending as well as their 2010 IT budget and spending plans at either an entire organization level or at a business unit/division/branch level.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What business imperatives are currently having the greatest impact on IT spending?</li>
<li>What are organizations’ general spending plans for IT products and services in 2010 and beyond?</li>
<li>How do spending plans vary by organization size, geographic region, industry, and other variables?</li>
<li>What is driving the changes between 2009 spending and 2010 planned spending?</li>
<li>Which IT initiatives do organizations feel are least likely to be impacted by current or future IT budget reductions? Conversely, which initiatives are most likely to be cut from IT’s wish list?</li>
<li>Within specific technology segments—such as servers, storage, networking, security, and information management—which initiatives and technologies within those segments will sustain investment?</li>
<li>What factors will be most important in justifying IT investments to the business over the next 12-18 months?</li>
<li>What is the relationship between current and future IT spending and an organization’s overall purchasing pattern for IT products and services?</li>
<li>What is the relationship between current and future IT spending and an organization’s overall tolerance for business risk?</li>
</ul>
<p>Survey participants represented a wide range of industries including manufacturing, financial services, communications and media, health care, retail, government, and business services.</p>
<p>
For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please download the executive summary below.</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2010/01/ESG-Research-Report-2010-IT-Spending-Intentions-Abstract.pdf" target="_blank">ESG Research Report 2010 IT Spending Intentions Executive Summary</a></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/01/2010-it-spending-intentions-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESG Research Brief: Reference Research &#8211; Client Access Device Types</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/09/esg-research-brief-reference-research-client-access-device-types/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/09/esg-research-brief-reference-research-client-access-device-types/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Doherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Client Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esgmedia.net/?p=5851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESG Reference Research includes data-centric reports and briefs designed for market intelligence, marketing, product marketing/management, engineering, and corporate strategy professionals at IT vendor organizations. ESG’s Reference Research content is designed to assist in market segmentation, market sizing, product requirements analysis, and other business planning exercises. This Reference Research brief focuses on the average client access [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="abstract">ESG Reference Research includes data-centric reports and briefs designed for market intelligence, marketing, product marketing/management, engineering, and corporate strategy professionals at IT vendor organizations.  ESG’s Reference Research content is designed to assist in market segmentation, market sizing, product requirements analysis, and other business planning exercises.  This Reference Research brief focuses on the average client access device profile—i.e., relative use of desktop PCs laptop PCs, thin clients, and other devices—across a number of different organizational dimensions including number of employees and primary industry.</div>
<private_premium>
<h1>Data Overview</h1>
<p>Data presented in this brief was collected via a survey of 480 IT decision makers at North American and Western European midmarket (i.e., 100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (i.e., 1,000 or more employees) organizations.<a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a> In this survey, respondents were asked to provide ESG with detailed information on their current usage of PCs and other client access devices that provide general-purpose PC functionality.  Figure 1 shows the average percentage of client devices by type among ESG’s total respondent base.  Figure 2 and Table 1 show relative client access device types by number of employees, while Figure 3 shows the average percentage of client access device types currently in use across different industries.  Finally, Figure 4 shows current client access device types by the percentage of the respondent organization’s total employees that currently use a desktop PC, laptop PC, or other client access device providing general-purpose PC functionality for work on a daily basis.</p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 1. Average Client Access Device Type Profile</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5857" title="caf1" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf1.png" alt="caf1" width="648" height="395" /></a></p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 2. Average Client Access Device Type Profile, by Company Size (Midmarket vs. Enterprise)</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5858" title="caf2" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf2.png" alt="caf2" width="650" height="373" /></a></p>
<div class="graph_top">Table 1. Average Client Access Device Type Profile, by Number of Employees</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/cat1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5856" title="cat1" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/cat1.png" alt="cat1" width="649" height="322" /></a></p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 3. Average Client Access Device Type Profile, by Industry</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf3.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5859" title="caf3" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf3.png" alt="caf3" width="648" height="367" /></a></p>
<div class="graph_top">Figure 4. Average Client Access Device Type Profile, by Organization’s Propensity to Use PCs and PC-like Devices</div>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf4.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5860" title="caf4" src="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/09/caf4.png" alt="caf4" width="647" height="359" /></a></p>
<hr size="1" /><a name="_ftn1">[1]</a> Source: ESG Research Report<em>, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Market Trends</em>, February 2009.</p>
</private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/09/esg-research-brief-reference-research-client-access-device-types/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 IT Professional Services &amp; Outsourcing Spending Intentions</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/06/2009-it-professional-services-outsourcing-spending-intentions-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/06/2009-it-professional-services-outsourcing-spending-intentions-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lundell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Laliberte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Professional Services and Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midmarket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esgresearch.com/?p=3160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess IT priorities pertaining to professional services and outsourcing over the next 12-24 months—and especially in light of the current global economic crisis—ESG surveyed 492 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations. All respondents were personally responsible for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess IT priorities pertaining to professional services and outsourcing over the next 12-24 months—and especially in light of the current global economic crisis—ESG surveyed 492 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations. All respondents were personally responsible for or familiar with their organization’s 2008 IT spending as well as their 2009 IT budget and spending plans, either at an entire organization level or at a business unit/division/branch level.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What business imperatives are currently having the greatest impact on spending for third-party IT services, including consulting and outsourcing?</li>
<li>What are organizations’ general spending plans for IT professional services and outsourcing offerings in 2009 and beyond?</li>
<li>To what extent are those plans impacted by the current global economic crisis?</li>
<li>How do spending plans vary by organization size, geographic region, industry, and other factors?</li>
<li>What is driving the changes between 2008 spending and 2009 planned spending?</li>
<li>What is the relationship between an organization’s overall tolerance for business risk and current and future IT spending on professional services and outsourcing solutions?</li>
<li>What is the relationship between the ability of IT organizations to meet the needs of constituents and current and future IT spending on professional services and outsourcing solutions?</li>
</ul>
<p>Survey participants represented a wide range of industries including manufacturing, financial services, communications and media, health care, retail, government, and professional services.</p>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please download the executive summary below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/07/ESG-Research-Report-Outsourcing-and-PS-Spending_Abstract.pdf">ESG Research Report Outsourcing and PS Spending Executive Summary</a><br />
<br/><br/></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/06/2009-it-professional-services-outsourcing-spending-intentions-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Confidential Data Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/04/protecting-confidential-data-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/04/protecting-confidential-data-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Oltsik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop End-point Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information and Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Oltsik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esgresearch.com/?p=3163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESG surveyed 308 North American and Western European IT and information security professionals representing enterprise-class organizations (1,000 employees or more) that were responsible for or familiar with their organization’s current policies, procedures, and technologies used to protect and secure confidential information. The survey was designed to answer the following questions: Problem definition and scope. How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESG surveyed 308 North American and Western European IT and information security professionals representing enterprise-class organizations (1,000 employees or more) that were responsible for or familiar with their organization’s current policies, procedures, and technologies used to protect and secure confidential information.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Problem definition and scope.
<ul>
<li>How much of their organization’s data do security professionals consider to be confidential?</li>
<li>Do users know how many copies of confidential data they have and where they are located?</li>
<li>What are the biggest pain points?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Market dynamics and purchasing plans.
<ul>
<li>What’s driving demand for confidential data security solutions and in what time frame?</li>
<li>Which areas of confidential data security will users address first?</li>
<li>In light of the global recession, how are users budgeting for confidential data security expenditures?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Policies, processes, and procedures.
<ul>
<li>Which specific confidential data security policies and procedures are most important?</li>
<li>If so, how are they defined, monitored, and enforced?</li>
<li>How effective are these policies, processes, and procedures?</li>
<li>What changes need to occur?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Technology deployment and purchasing plans.
<ul>
<li>Which tools are currently in use?</li>
<li>Which ones will be deployed within the next 12 months?</li>
<li>Are users deploying encryption technologies? If so, where?</li>
<li>Are encryption technology deployments tactical or strategic in nature? Are they changing?</li>
<li>How are users managing encryption keys? Is this adequate? Will it change?</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please download the executive summary below.<br />
<br /></br><br />
<a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/04/ESG-Research-Report-Protecting-Confidential-Data-Revisited-Abstract..pdf">ESG Research Report Protecting Confidential Data Revisited Executive Summary.</a><br />
<br /></br></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/04/protecting-confidential-data-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Data Center Spending Intentions Survey</title>
		<link>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/03/2009-data-center-spending-intentions-survey-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/03/2009-data-center-spending-intentions-survey-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Lundell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center Strategy and Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Gahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McKnight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esgmedia.net/?p=7600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to assess IT data center priorities over the next 12-24 months—and especially in light of the current global economic crisis—ESG recently surveyed 492 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations. The survey was designed to answer the following questions: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to assess IT data center priorities over the next 12-24 months—and especially in light of the current global economic crisis—ESG recently surveyed 492 North American and Western European senior IT professionals representing midmarket (100 to 999 employees) and enterprise-class (1,000 employees or more) organizations.</p>
<p>The survey was designed to answer the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>What business imperatives are currently having the greatest impact on IT spending?</li>
<li>What are organizations’ general spending plans for IT products and services in 2009 and beyond?</li>
<li>To what extent are those plans impacted by the current global economic crisis?</li>
<li>How do spending plans vary by organization size, geographic region, industry, and other variables?</li>
<li>How does planned IT spending break down per quarter for 2009?</li>
<li>What is driving the changes between 2008 spending and 2009 planned spending?</li>
<li>Which IT initiatives do organizations feel are least likely to be impacted by current or future IT budget reductions? Conversely, which initiatives are most likely to be cut from IT’s wish list?</li>
<li>Within specific technology segments—such as servers/virtualization, storage, networking, security, and information management—which initiatives and technologies within those segments will sustain investment?</li>
<li>… and much more!</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on the contents and findings of this report, please download the executive summary below.<br />
<br /></br></p>
<p><a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/media/wordpress/2009/12/ESG-Research-Report_2009-Data-Center-Spending_Abstract.pdf">ESG Research Report 2009 Data Center Spending Intentions Executive Summary</a><br />
<br /></br></p>
<private_premium></private_premium>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/03/2009-data-center-spending-intentions-survey-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
